Homo erectus is the genus and species combination that was retained for all mainland Asian, Taiwanese, and Javanese fossil material

Homo erectus is the genus and species combination that was retained for all mainland Asian, Taiwanese, and Javanese fossil material

Jun 14, 2022 von Megacorp

Homo erectus is the genus and species combination that was retained for all mainland Asian, Taiwanese, and Javanese fossil material


The most popularly held notion is that Homo erectus is derived from H. ergaster or verso pre-ergaster form that “quickly” moved out of Africa into Eastern Europe and Southeast Oriente. However, H. georgicus is another possibility for the ancestor of H. erectus.


Eugene Dubois discovered the first H. erectus material at the Trinil site (see Figure 29.1) on the Scapolo River sopra Java sopra 1891. While there are problems with the dates, the oldest material from the Javanese site of Modjokerto may be “contemporary” with African and Georgian material at 1.8 mya. Other famous Javanese sites are Sangiran, Ngandong, and Trinil. Java is part of the Sunda shelf, and when initially colonized by H. erectus, it was connected sicuro mainland Oriente (see Figure 29.2). After reaching Java and possibly other areas of Southeast Levante, later groups of H. erectus moved north into Pendenza. The earliest Chinese fossils are dated to 1 mya. First assigned onesto the genus Sinanthropus jpeoplemeet (“Chinese man”), the material was later included sopra our own genus after Franz Weidenreich pointed sicuro the similarities between the various assemblages of erectus-like fossils and other extinct and modern humans. The first fossils were discovered at the now famous site of Zhoukoudian (formerly Choukoudian), near Beijing (formerly Peking and hence the term, “Peking Man”). The local people called them “dragon bones” and were using them for medicinal purposes. Material from Zhoukoudian spans a time period of over 200,000 years, from 460 to 230 kya, with three distinct cultural periods thought esatto be per evidence.

One of the great mysteries of paleoanthropology surrounds the Zhoukoudian material. Weidenreich and his predecessors, Davidson Black and J. Gunnar Andersson, had amassed an unprecedented amount of fossil material from the site. Coppia onesto the imminent Japanese invasion, Weidenreich packed up the fossil material in 1941 with the intent of having it shipped onesto the United States. However, the material disappeared, and all that remains are Weidenreich’s libretto, drawings, and some casts of the original fossils.

Other Chinese sites are found mediante the counties of Lantian, Yunxian, and Hexian. Per new discovery on the island of Taiwan has been linked to H. erectus, with the closest resemblance puro the Hexian remains (Chang et al. 2015). Finally, the Narmada site con India has been a topic of debate for per long time but it has now been decided, at least by a portion of the paleoanthropological community, as being Homo erectus.

Sundaland (northwest of the Wallace Line). “Map of Sunda and Sahul” by Maximilian Dorrbecker is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.


While many of the physical characteristics of H. erectus are similar onesto H. ergaster, the Asian species is unique per per number of ways. Asian forms exhibit per thickening along the sagittal suture, termed verso sagittal keel. The keel gives the skull per pentagonal shape in ciclocampestre-section. It is unknown whether the keel served per function.

Their incisors were shoveled, an adaptation that increases the logorio resistance of teeth, especially when using them as tools. The molar enamel was characterized by per unique wrinkling pattern. Both of those dental characteristics are found durante modern people of Levante and Asian ancestry and are interpreted by some scholars as evidence of regional continuity; durante other words, there was a gradual evolution from erectus-like forms through archaic human populations and into modern populations mediante multiple areas inizio gene flow.

Review of Derived Characteristics

  • Sagittal keel.
  • Shoveled incisors.
  • Wrinkled molar enamel.


Javanese sites in the early Pleistocene would have been conducive to tropical-adapted animals like Homo erectus. The dipartimento was part of the land bridge that was exposed beginning

2.5 mya, making it accessible by land. Pleistocene Java was per mix of environments consisting of a variety of forest types, freshwater lakes and rivers, brackish ).

At the time of H. erectus occupation, the site of Zhoukoudian, Declivio, was sopra verso transitional ceinture between temperate steppe and boreal forest. It would thus have been seasonally cold and would likely only have been habitable during the warmer months.

Culturally and technologically, Asian H. erectus are thought esatto have been somewhat similar puro African H. ergaster. One of the key differences is the fact that the Acheulian industry never made it preciso Asia. The earliest inhabitants of Oriente carried with them the Oldowan tool tradition, but the inventors of the Acheulian tradition apparently never followed. On maps, the Movius Line (see Figure 29.5) demarcates the border between the two tool traditions during the Pleistocene. It has been suggested that bamboo would have been a suitable material for making tools, which could explain the paucity of stone tools found.

Populations of H. erectus survived in Asia for much of the Pleistocene Epoch. Recent redating of the Javanese site of Ngandong has yielded dates as recent as 53–27 kya. Even more surprising is the recent discovery of dwarfed hominins on the island of Flores, termed H. floresiensis, that have been dated esatto 18 kya. H. floresiensis is thought puro be descended from verso population of H. erectus that adapted preciso limited island resources by becoming dwarfed per size.


Von Megacorp

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert